| IRS: Phone
tax fraud, abusive Roth IRAs are top tax scams
WASHINGTON, Feb. 20, 2007 –– The IRS has identified
12 of the most blatant scams affecting American taxpayers
and warned people not to fall for schemes peddled by scamsters.
This year, the “Dirty Dozen” highlights five
new scams that IRS auditors and criminal investigators have
uncovered. Topping the list are fraudulent refunds being claimed
in connection with the special Telephone Excise Tax Refund
available to most taxpayers this filing season. The IRS is
actively investigating instances of this scam involving tax
preparers who are preparing inflated refund requests.
Also new to the Dirty Dozen this year are abuses pertaining
to Roth IRAs, the American Indian Employment Credit, domestic
shell corporations and structured entities.
“Taxpayers shouldn’t let their guard down,”
IRS Commissioner Mark W. Everson said. “Don’t
get taken by scam artists making outrageous promises. If you
use a tax professional, pick someone who is reputable. Taxpayers
should remember they are ultimately responsible for what is
on their tax return even if some unscrupulous preparers have
steered them in the wrong direction.”
Involvement in tax schemes leads to problems for scam artists
and taxpayers. Tax return preparers and promoters risk significant
penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.
The IRS urges taxpayers to avoid these common schemes:
- Telephone excise tax refund abuses: Early
filings show some individual taxpayers have requested large
and apparently improper amounts for the special telephone
tax refund. In some cases, taxpayers appear to be requesting
a refund of the entire amount of their phone bills, rather
than just the three-percent tax on long-distance and bundled
service to which they are entitled. Some tax preparers are
helping their clients file apparently improper requests.
The IRS is investigating potential abuses in this area and
will take prompt action against taxpayers who claim improper
refund amounts and against the return preparers who help
them.
- Abusive Roth IRAs: Taxpayers should be
wary of advisers who encourage them to shift under-valued
property to Roth Individual Retirement Arrangements (IRAs).
In one variation, a promoter has the taxpayer move under-valued
common stock into a Roth IRA, circumventing the annual maximum
contribution limit and allowing otherwise taxable income
to go untaxed.
- Phishing is a technique used by identity
thieves to acquire personal financial data in order to gain
access to the financial accounts of unsuspecting consumers,
run up charges on their credit cards or apply for loans
in their names. These Internet-based criminals pose as representatives
of a financial institution –– or sometimes the
IRS itself –– and send out fictitious e-mail
correspondence in an attempt to trick consumers into disclosing
private information. A typical e-mail notifies a taxpayer
of an outstanding refund and urges the taxpayer to click
on a hyperlink and visit an official-looking Web site. The
Web site then solicits a social security and credit card
number. It is important to note the IRS does not use e-mail
to initiate contact with taxpayers about issues related
to their accounts. If a taxpayer has any doubt whether a
contact from the IRS is authentic, the taxpayer should call
(800) 829-1040 to confirm it.
- Disguised corporate ownership: Domestic
shell corporations and other entities are being formed and
operated in certain states for the purpose of disguising
the ownership of the business or financial activity. Once
formed, these anonymous entities can be, and are being,
used to facilitate underreporting of income, non-filing
of tax returns, listed transactions, money laundering, financial
crimes and possibly terrorist financing. The IRS is working
with state authorities to identify these entities and to
bring their owners into compliance.
- Zero wages: In this scam, which first
appeared in the Dirty Dozen in 2006, a Form 4852 (Substitute
Form W-2) or a “corrected” Form 1099 showing
zero or little income is submitted with a federal tax return.
The taxpayer may include a statement rebutting wages and
taxes reported by the payer to the IRS. An explanation on
the Form 4852 may cite statutory language behind Internal
Revenue Code sections 3401 and 3121 or may include some
reference to the paying company refusing to issue a corrected
Form W-2 for fear of IRS retaliation.
- Return preparer fraud: Dishonest return
preparers can cause many headaches for taxpayers who fall
victim to their schemes. Such preparers make their money
by skimming a portion of their clients’ refunds and
charging inflated fees for return preparation services.
They attract new clients by promising large refunds. Some
preparers promote filing fraudulent claims for refunds on
items such as fuel tax credits to recover taxes paid in
prior years. Taxpayers should choose carefully when hiring
a tax preparer. As the old saying goes, “If it sounds
too good to be true, it probably is.” Remember that
no matter who prepares the return, the taxpayer is ultimately
responsible for its accuracy. Since 2002, the courts have
issued injunctions ordering dozens of individuals to cease
preparing returns, and the Department of Justice has filed
complaints against dozens of others. During fiscal year
2006, 109 tax return preparers were convicted of tax crimes
and sentenced to an average of 18 months in prison.
- American Indian Employment Credit: Taxpayers
submit returns and claims reducing taxable income by substantial
amounts citing an American Indian employment or treaty credit.
Although there is an Indian Employment Credit available
for businesses that employ Native Americans or their spouses,
there is no provision for its use by employees. In a somewhat
similar scam, unscrupulous promoters have informed Native
Americans that they are not subject to federal income taxation.
The promoters solicit individual Indians to file Form W-8
BEN seeking relief from all withholding of federal taxation.
A recent “phishing” variation has promoters
using false IRS letterheads to solicit personal financial
information that they claim the IRS needs in order to process
their "non-tax" status.
Trust misuse: For years unscrupulous promoters have urged
taxpayers to transfer assets into trusts. They promise reduction
of income subject to tax, deductions for personal expenses
and reduced estate or gift taxes. However, some trusts do
not deliver the promised tax benefits. There are currently
more than 150 active abusive trust investigations underway
and 49 injunctions have been obtained against promoters
since 2001. As with other arrangements, taxpayers should
seek the advice of a trusted professional before entering
into a trust.
- Structured entity credits: Promoters
of this newly identified scheme are setting up partnerships
to own and sell state conservation easement credits, federal
rehabilitation credits and other credits. The purported
credits are the only assets owned by the partnership and
once the credits are fully used, an investor receives a
K-1 indicating the initial investment is a total loss, which
is then deducted on the investor’s individual tax
return. Forming such an entity is not a viable business
purpose. In other words, the investments are not valid,
and the losses are not deductible.
- Abuse of charitable organizations and deductions:
The IRS continues to observe the use of tax-exempt
organizations to improperly shield income or assets from
taxation. This can occur when a taxpayer moves assets or
income to a tax-exempt supporting organization or donor-advised
fund but maintains control over the assets or income. Contributions
of non-cash assets continue to be an area of abuse, especially
with regard to overvaluation of contributed property. In
addition, the IRS is noticing the return of private tuition
payments being disguised as charitable contributions to
religious organizations.
- Form 843 tax abatement: This scam rests
on faulty interpretation of the Internal Revenue Code. It
involves the filer requesting abatement of previously assessed
tax using Form 843. Many using this scam have not previously
filed tax returns and the tax they are trying to have abated
has been assessed by the IRS through the Substitute for
Return Program. The filer uses the Form 843 to list reasons
for the request. Often, one of the reasons is: "Failed
to properly compute and/or calculate IRC Sec 83-Property
Transferred in Connection with Performance of Service."
- Frivolous arguments: Promoters have been
known to make the following outlandish claims: the Sixteenth
Amendment concerning congressional power to lay and collect
income taxes was never ratified; wages are not income; filing
a return and paying taxes are merely voluntary; and being
required to file Form 1040 violates the Fifth Amendment
right against self-incrimination or the Fourth Amendment
right to privacy. Don’t believe these or other similar
claims. These arguments are false and have been thrown out
of court. While taxpayers have the right to contest their
tax liabilities in court, no one has the right to disobey
the law.
IRS still watches scams that fall off the list
Five of last year’s Dirty Dozen tax scams rotated off
the list for 2007. While the IRS has seen a decline in the
occurrence of some of these scams –– abusive credit
counseling agencies, for example –– other problems,
such as offshore abusive transactions continue to be an area
of particular concern for the agency. The absence of a particular
scheme from the Dirty Dozen should not be taken as an indication
that the IRS is unaware of it or not taking steps to counter
it.
How to report suspected tax fraud activity
Suspected tax fraud can be reported to the IRS using IRS
Form 3949-A, Information Referral. Form 3949-A is available
for download from the IRS Web site at IRS.gov, or by mail
by calling (800) 829-3676. The completed form or a letter
detailing the alleged fraudulent activity should be addressed
to the Internal Revenue Service, Fresno, CA 93888. The mailing
should include specific information about who is being reported,
the activity being reported, how the activity became known,
when the alleged violation took place, the amount of money
involved and any other information that might be helpful in
an investigation. The person filing the report is not required
to self-identify, although it is helpful to do so. The identity
of the person filing the report can be kept confidential.
The person may also be entitled to a reward.
Return to the list |